tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31723906.post1130985960098167695..comments2024-01-28T22:17:29.551-08:00Comments on Pappy's Golden Age Comics Blogzine: Number 2109: Taking a Whiz into the futurePappyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01977289662431694607noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31723906.post-31306632273980873342017-10-05T09:59:04.377-07:002017-10-05T09:59:04.377-07:00Daniel, well, I'm afraid I live half in denial...Daniel, well, I'm afraid I live half in denial of death, and half in shuddering anticipation of the event.<br /><br />I have a friend who is 76, has had two heart attacks and a stroke, and says he believes he is living on "borrowed time," so he has decided to enjoy whatever is left of his remaining time. I say, if he can survive heart attacks and a stroke and still enjoy life, then I should adopt his philosophy.<br /><br />On the other hand, there are business decisions to be made in the event of my death, and I have unwisely put them off. That is the half of me that is in denial.<br /><br />I also tend to grasp at straws...a thought ran through my head a while ago, "If Keith Richards and Mick Jagger can abuse their bodies and survive as long as they have, surely I will do much better than them!" But they are anomalies. Most people who have lived such a debauched existence die young, so they are no measuring sticks to judge how much time one has left.<br /><br />So, woe. Woe unto me.<br /><br />But, back to the story. As much as I love time travel I don't believe it is science fiction, but fantasy. That is despite YouTube videos that purport to show <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLU3F9glcgg" rel="nofollow">time travelers</a>. In fantasy one can do anything.<br /><br />Pappyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01977289662431694607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31723906.post-49585750255256957942017-10-02T12:04:12.005-07:002017-10-02T12:04:12.005-07:00Hi Pappy! What a great premise — using a time caps...Hi Pappy! What a great premise — using a time capsule to learn about weapons from the past! What are the odds that anyone will ever find the 1939 and 1964 worlds fairs time capsules or being able to understand what’s in them?Brad S.https://www.blogger.com/profile/04859168410639247441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31723906.post-80203074153122817952017-10-02T02:32:46.466-07:002017-10-02T02:32:46.466-07:00I don't know why so many folk maul “wiz”, from...I don't know why so many folk maul “wiz”, from “wizard”, into “whiz”; especially as “wizard” is not pronounced /ˈhwɪzəɹd/. <br /><br />The reduced size of the people of the futute invites comparison to the Eloi. But there seems to have been no explanation offered here. <br /><br />I suppose that Wilson went to 15000 because changing 1941 would seem to invite paradox, but 5000 was well in the past by 15000. And atomic disintegrators are even more dire weapons than are those that were known in 1941. <br /><br />Without paradox and without unleashing new technologies, Wilson could have made successive leaps a few seconds into the future, clobbering opponents at each appearance. <br /><br />One wonders how not only had knowledge of weaponry been lost but its independent reïnvention had not occurred. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.oeconomist.com/blogs/daniel/?p=7308" rel="nofollow">I've a theory about how most people imagine when they will die.</a> As for me, at times I'd be glad to know, as it would simply the associated optimization problem. Daniel [oeconomist.com]https://www.blogger.com/profile/06763094285750736837noreply@blogger.com